Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/57
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Carol F.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-07T03:27:06Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-07T03:27:06Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citation61 Loy. L. Rev. 93en_US
dc.identifier.issn0192-9720-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/57-
dc.description.abstractIn this essay, I discuss briefly the values of equality and honest government in Judge Wright’s career before they intersected in the area of campaign finance. I then contrast Judge Wright’s views on money, politics and the First Amendment—as set forth in the D.C. Circuit’s opinion in Buckley v. Valeo—with the position taken by the Supreme Court on appeal the following year. My essay goes on to discuss a 1982 law review article by Judge Wright, which explained why, in his view, promoting political equality was fully consistent with the First Amendment properly understood. I conclude with a few remarks about the role of money in politics today.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherLoyola University New Orleans College of Lawen_US
dc.subjectJ. Skelly Wrighten_US
dc.subjectBuckley v. Valeoen_US
dc.titleJUDGE J. SKELLY WRIGHT: POLITICS, MONEY AND EQUALITYen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Law Review

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lee-Proof.pdf154.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.