Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/78
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSurprenant, Jeffrey M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-11T19:54:02Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-11T19:54:02Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citation64 Loy. L. Rev. 257en_US
dc.identifier.issn0192-9720-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/78-
dc.description.abstractLouisiana courts have become increasingly overprotective of its citizens. Although usually seen in the context of juvenile court, parens patriae refers to the idea that the state holds the inherent power and authority to protect persons who are unable to act on their own behalf—similar to the role of a parent. Louisiana courts have extended this idea by claiming that one of its duties is to protect adult citizens from entering into contracts that are not completely balanced. Louisiana courts, however, have disregarded its citizens’ personal duty to safeguard themselves from unfavorable agreements. Further, the courts do not, and cannot, have the authority to decide what is in the best interest of its citizens.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAcurio v. Acurioen_US
dc.titleCurio v. Acurio: Parens Patriae in Marital Regimesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Law Review

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Surprenant-FI-KML-6.4.18.pdf410.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.