Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/83
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLanglois Jr., Gary M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-18T19:48:36Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-18T19:48:36Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citation63 Loy. L. Rev. 291en_US
dc.identifier.issn0192-9720-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/83-
dc.description.abstractThe collateral source rule—a fundamental principle of United States’ tort law since the mid-1800s—has fallen under attack in recent years. As of 2009, “forty-two jurisdictions ha[d] enacted and retained some form of statute . . . restrict[ing] the collateral source rule.” Louisiana is one of the few jurisdictions that has not yet statutorily restricted its rule. While persuasive arguments are voiced by both supporters and opponents of the rule, Louisiana’s acceptance of this Comment’s proposal would strike a proper balance in the debate over the rule’s existence.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherLoyola University New Orleans College of Lawen_US
dc.subjectCollateral Source Ruleen_US
dc.subjectLouisianaen_US
dc.titleLouisiana's Collateral Source Rule: Eliminating the "Windfall" Arising from Medical Expenses Write-Offsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Law Review

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
63.2 pg 291 Langlois-FI-KML-PRINT-v3.pdf525.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.