DSpace Repository

STATE EX REL. ESTEEN V. STATE: FAIRNESS, FREEDOM, AND A CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE IN LOUISIANA

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Case, Curtis J.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-03-03T21:54:32Z
dc.date.available 2020-03-03T21:54:32Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation 65 Loy. L. Rev. 431 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0192-9720
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/133
dc.description.abstract Four kilos is a lot of cocaine. But should it warrant life in prison? In 1998, Louisiana’s punishment for possessing over four hundred grams of cocaine was thirty to sixty years imprisonment at hard labor and a fine of between $250,000 and $600,000. Since that time, the Louisiana legislature has lowered the penalties for this crime and took affirmative steps to alleviate the harsh penalties for a number of other offenses. Although courts generally sentence a defendant according to the penalties in place at the time of the offense, what happens when a lawmaking body passes legislation calling for the retroactive application of newer, lower penalties? And still further, who has the authority to remediate final sentences along these lines and release offenders into society? en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Loyola University New Orleans College of Law en_US
dc.subject fairness en_US
dc.subject freedom en_US
dc.title STATE EX REL. ESTEEN V. STATE: FAIRNESS, FREEDOM, AND A CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE IN LOUISIANA en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account