DSpace Repository

Curio v. Acurio: Parens Patriae in Marital Regimes

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Surprenant, Jeffrey M.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-02-11T19:54:02Z
dc.date.available 2019-02-11T19:54:02Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation 64 Loy. L. Rev. 257 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0192-9720
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/78
dc.description.abstract Louisiana courts have become increasingly overprotective of its citizens. Although usually seen in the context of juvenile court, parens patriae refers to the idea that the state holds the inherent power and authority to protect persons who are unable to act on their own behalf—similar to the role of a parent. Louisiana courts have extended this idea by claiming that one of its duties is to protect adult citizens from entering into contracts that are not completely balanced. Louisiana courts, however, have disregarded its citizens’ personal duty to safeguard themselves from unfavorable agreements. Further, the courts do not, and cannot, have the authority to decide what is in the best interest of its citizens. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Acurio v. Acurio en_US
dc.title Curio v. Acurio: Parens Patriae in Marital Regimes en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account